Review Β· 2026

Sign.Plus Review (2026): Swiss eSignature Platform Tested for Modern Teams

Swiss-built eSignature platform with modern UX, strong compliance (ESIGN, eIDAS, ZertES), and competitive pricing for growing teams.

86 /100

Editorial score

Very Good

Reviewed by eSignCompare Β· Last updated May 13, 2026

Affiliate disclosure: we may earn a commission when you purchase through links on our site. This never influences our editorial scores. Learn More β†’

Sign.Plus

Best For

Freelancers, small businesses, and mid-sized companies that need legally compliant eSignatures with a clean interface, without paying enterprise prices.

At a Glance
86 /100

Editorial score

Very Good

Ease of Use
92
Features
84
Pricing
88
Security
90
Support
72

Pros

  • Fastest setup we tested: uploaded, placed fields and sent in 97 seconds
  • Swiss-built, with independently audited ISO 27001 and SOC 2, plus rare ZertES coverage
  • Unlimited signature requests from Professional up, with no per-envelope fees
  • Data residency across 22 regions including Geneva and Zurich, Switzerland by default

Cons

  • Some advanced signing and verification features require prepaid credits: qualified signatures, SMS verification codes and ID checks are not included in the standard plan allowance
  • Smaller integration library than DocuSign or Adobe Sign, with no native HubSpot or NetSuite
  • Workflow automation is basic: no conditional routing or multi-stage approvals

Specs at a glance

From our own hands-on testing. A row appears only where our review documents it.

Specs at a glance β€” Sign.Plus
Free plan Yes
Starts at $9.99/mo (annual) $14.99 billed monthly β€” Personal
Qualified signature (QES) Native Β· paid credits, any plan
Legal validity EU (eIDAS) + Switzerland (ZertES)
Data residency Configurable by region
HIPAA Top tier only
FedRAMP Not offered
Editorial score
86 Very Good

Overview

Sign.Plus comes from Alohi SA, the Swiss company behind Fax.Plus and Scan.Plus. It covers the basics well: upload a document, drop in signature fields, send it out, track who has signed. Most people get their first document sent without reading any documentation.

We timed a real send. Contract uploaded, three fields placed, out to a client in 97 seconds. There is no onboarding wizard and no demo call between you and the product.

The compliance matters more than the polish. Sign.Plus covers the ESIGN Act and UETA in the US, eIDAS in the EU, and ZertES in Switzerland. Swiss coverage is rare at this price, which is why Swiss legal and finance firms keep shortlisting it.

It runs in the browser, with native iOS and Android apps that stay in sync. Every paid plan includes Scan.Plus Pro, Alohi's mobile scanner, at no extra cost.

Who it suits

Freelancers, small agencies, boutique law firms and European startups that need real compliance without enterprise pricing. It fits best when you send a steady but moderate number of documents and care more about getting them signed than about wiring signing into a CRM.

Hands-On: Signing a Document

We ran a real document end to end rather than describing the interface from marketing pages: a one-page service agreement uploaded, signed by us, sent to a second party, and signed by them. The timestamps below come from that session, and everything in this section is what we saw on screen.

Uploading and choosing a path

The Sign tab opens a single card with a drop zone that accepts PDF, DOC, PPT, XLS, JPG, PNG, RTF and TIFF. Once a file lands you get two buttons and no other decisions to make: Sign Myself or Request Signature. That fork is the entire information architecture, and it is a large part of why this platform tests well on ease of use: there is no envelope, project or workflow object to create before you can start.

Sign.Plus upload screen with a PDF added and the Sign Myself and Request Signature buttons
One card, one fork. No envelope or project abstraction stands between you and signing.

Signing it yourself

Sign Myself opens the editor directly. The field rail offers Signature, Initials, Date, Text and Checkbox; you drag one onto the page and it becomes editable in place.

The signature dialog has four tabs: Type, Draw, Upload and History. Type generates several handwriting styles from your name, with pen colour and thickness controls tucked into the corner. History reuses a signature you have already created, which matters more than it sounds if you sign regularly. Above the buttons sits the consent line: “By clicking on Confirm, I agree that this is a legal representation of my signature.”

Sign.Plus Modify Signature dialog showing Type, Draw, Upload and History tabs with generated handwriting styles
Four ways to produce a signature, with the legal-representation consent shown before you confirm.

Placing the remaining fields took under a minute. Fields snap to where you click rather than to a rigid grid, so lining a signature up with a printed rule on the page is quick.

The sample agreement with signature, name, title and date fields completed in the Sign.Plus editor
Self-signing complete. Upload to signed took roughly three minutes.

Requesting a signature from someone else

The other path is a four-step wizard: Add Documents → Add Recipients → Add Fields → Review, with the progress bar visible throughout.

Each recipient takes a name, an email and a role: Needs to Sign, Receives a Copy or Signs in Person. Add Signing Step creates sequential routing, so a second signer is only emailed once the first has finished. That is a real workflow feature, and it is available without an enterprise contract.

Sign.Plus Add Recipients step with the role dropdown open showing Needs to Sign, Receives a Copy and Signs in Person
Roles and sequential signing steps, on a standard plan.

Per-recipient identity verification is offered here: Passcode, SMS Code, or an ID Check the interface describes as AI-powered, with the note that it “will be required to access the document.” The dropdown shows all three to any account, but that is not the same as having them. Under Settings, only passcode verification is genuinely included; SMS code and ID check run on prepaid credits you buy separately, and an account that has not bought any shows a balance of zero. Priced from the in-product purchase screens: SMS at $0.30 per message and ID checks at $2.00 each. Budget for them as consumables rather than assuming the dropdown means included.

Sign.Plus verification method dropdown offering Passcode, SMS Code and AI-powered ID Check
Per-recipient verification: passcode, SMS code, or AI-powered ID check.

Placing fields for the other party

Step three colour-codes fields by recipient. Our own fields were already filled from the earlier pass; the client’s appeared as green placeholders. Date fields carry a format hint (MMMM dd, YYYY) so the signer cannot guess wrong, and this step adds an Attachments field the self-sign path does not offer, useful when you need an ID or a certificate returned alongside the contract.

Sign.Plus Add Fields step with the recipient selector and green placeholder fields for the client
Recipient-coloured fields, plus an Attachments type that self-signing does not expose.

The send step

Review pre-fills the subject line as “Please sign: [filename]” and surfaces two settings that quietly decide whether an agreement closes: Send Reminders, which we left on daily, and Document Expires, defaulted to 30 days. Both are defaults here rather than options you have to go looking for.

Sign.Plus review step showing email subject, message body, daily reminder cadence and a 30-day expiry
Reminders and expiry are defaults, not settings you have to discover.

After sending, the document appears under Pending as “Out for signature (0/1)” with a progress bar and the recipient name. The Documents area splits into Folders, All, Pending, Completed, Draft and Trash.

Sign.Plus Documents Pending tab showing the agreement out for signature with a progress indicator
Status is a fraction rather than a label, so you can see how many signers are done.

What the signer sees

The request arrives from notification@sign.plus, subject-lined with the document name, carrying a Review Document button, the sender’s name, a warning not to forward the secure link, and the expiry date in the body. The email is Sign.Plus-branded rather than sender-branded; custom branding is a paid-tier feature.

The signature request email received in Gmail, sent via Sign.Plus with a Review Document button
The request as the counterparty receives it, with the expiry date stated in the body.

Opening it presents a consent gate before anything else: a checkbox reading “I agree to use electronic records and signatures”, which the signer must accept to continue. This is the ESIGN and eIDAS consent step, and putting it first is the correct order.

Sign.Plus signer consent dialog with the electronic records and signatures checkbox
Consent is captured before the document can be acted on.

From there a yellow Start marker points at the first empty field and walks the signer through the rest. Our test signer, who had never used Sign.Plus, completed signature, name, title and date without any instruction from us.

The signer completing signature, name, title and date fields, guided by the Start marker
Guided field-to-field navigation. No training needed for a first-time signer.

Completion

The signer gets a confirmation reading “We will send you the signed copy once everyone signs”, and the document moves to Completed on the sender side with both signatures in place. The detail panel shows page count, status, and created and last-modified timestamps.

The completed agreement in Sign.Plus showing both signatures and a Completed status panel
Created 17:40, completed 17:57, ten minutes from send to fully executed.

The number that matters: we sent the request at 17:47 and it came back fully executed at 17:57. Ten minutes, including the signer reading a document they had never seen before. That is the practical basis for the ease-of-use score in this review, rather than an impression of the interface.

How qualified signatures are actually sold

We signed this document with a standard electronic signature. The qualified electronic signature (QES), the tier that carries the same legal weight as a handwritten signature across the EU, and the reason most European buyers shortlist this platform, is not bundled into any plan. It is a prepaid consumable bought separately through Stripe, and an account that has not bought credits shows QES unavailable with a zero balance.

The purchase screen prices it at $50 for 10 credits and $5,000 for 1,000. Those two points sit on the same straight line: $5.00 per qualified signature at every quantity, with no volume discount at all. A thousand qualified signatures cost exactly one hundred times what ten cost.

That reframes the cost comparison for anyone signing qualified documents regularly. A five-person team on Professional at roughly $19.99/user/month pays about $1,199 a year in seats; add 100 qualified signatures and the real figure is roughly $1,699. It also changes the competitive picture: Skribble sells qualified signatures from €5 pay-per-use but includes an annual quota on its Team and Pro plans and then charges €4.50 and €4 beyond it, so Skribble gets cheaper per signature as volume rises while Sign.Plus stays flat at $5 forever. For occasional qualified signing the two are close; at volume Skribble is the cheaper route. Model your own qualified volume with the cost calculator before committing, because the seat price alone will understate what you actually pay.

A Look Inside the Interface

Sign.Plus home dashboard with an upload area, recent templates and in-progress documents
Home. Upload area front and centre, with recently used templates, recently completed documents and an in-progress list showing a live 0/1 signing progress bar.
The Sign tab showing the upload card with Sign Myself and Request Signature buttons
Sign. The whole information architecture: upload, then pick one of two paths. Accepts PDF, DOC, PPT, XLS, JPG, PNG, RTF and TIFF.
The Documents area with Folders, All, Pending, Completed, Draft and Trash tabs
Documents. Split into Folders, All, Pending, Completed, Draft and Trash. Pending rows show a fraction, 0/1 signers done, rather than a vague status label.
The Templates screen with an upload area and a table of saved templates
Templates. Save a prepared document with its fields, then reuse it. The table tracks created and last-used dates, and warns when a template has no recipients set.
The Users screen showing seat count, invites available and an Add Seats button
Users. Seat management with an Add Seats action. Note the seat model is explicit: 1/1 used, 0 invites available, so extra colleagues are a purchase, not a toggle. (Email redacted by us.)
Account settings showing profile information, sign-in details and two-factor authentication
Account. Profile, sign-in and two-factor authentication. 2FA is available but off by default, worth turning on before you send anything real.
Signing settings showing saved signature and initials plus the signature request settings panel
Signing. Saved signature and initials, then the panel that matters commercially: passcode verification is included, while SMS code, ID check and qualified signatures all run on prepaid credits and read zero until purchased.
Branding settings with custom logo, custom URL redirection and e-signature certificate options
Branding. Custom logo and colour, custom URL redirection, and an e-signature certificate included alongside the signed document, the audit artefact you hand to a lawyer. Print to Sign covers desktop signing.
Plan and billing settings showing the plan type, request allowance and the Alohi product suite
Plan & Billing. This account is on Enterprise with unlimited signature requests, which makes the credit findings above much sharper, since qualified signatures still cost $5 each on the top tier.
Security settings showing single sign-on, two-factor enforcement and data residency options
Security. SSO and enforced 2FA are available but inactive by default. Data residency is the standout: 22 regions across the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific, including two Swiss options (Geneva and Zurich) plus Frankfurt, London, Finland, Belgium and the Netherlands. Switzerland is the default; this account had been switched to US hosting for testing, which is why South Carolina shows here.
Regulatory compliance panel with HIPAA and PHIPA requests and a trust centre with certification badges
Compliance. HIPAA (US) and PHIPA (Canada) agreements are request-based rather than self-serve, so the panel reads “Not Compliant” until you ask. The Trust Center lists ISO 27001, SOC 2, PCI DSS, GDPR, CCPA and STAR.
Integrations settings showing API plan type, sandbox API and connected apps
Integrations. The Developer API is a separate Sign.Plus product with its own plans, so the API plan type sits unset on an eSignature-only account, with Upgrade alongside. Documentation, a sandbox and personal access tokens are all available before buying anything, so a developer can evaluate the API without spending. Connected Apps lists Zapier here.

Key Features

Swiss and EU qualified signatures, supported natively

Sign.Plus issues QES under both Swiss ZertES and EU eIDAS through Swisscom Trust Services, which is rare at this price. Budget for it separately though: QES is not bundled into any plan. It is a prepaid credit at $5 per signature, and that holds on Enterprise too, where signature requests are otherwise unlimited. It also changes the recipient's journey: a QES document sends the signer to Swisscom for an identity check before they can sign.

HIPAA with a signed BAA at small-business pricing

Enterprise carries HIPAA with a signed BAA at $49.99 per user per month on annual billing. That is the cheapest published route to a BAA among the platforms we test, where DocuSign and Adobe both steer healthcare buyers into quote-only tiers. The agreement is request-based, so the compliance panel reads as non-compliant until you ask for it.

Data residency in 22 regions, two of them Swiss

You choose where documents are stored from 22 regions across the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific, with Geneva and Zurich alongside Frankfurt, London, Finland, Belgium and the Netherlands. Switzerland is the default. Very few competitors at this price let you pin storage to a named country at all.

In-person signing on a shared device

From Professional upward you can hand a laptop or tablet to someone standing in front of you, collect a handwritten signature on the spot, and have the signed copy and its certificate filed automatically. It suits clinics, letting agents and anyone who signs across a counter rather than by email.

Apps on every platform, and they stay in sync

Web, iOS and Android stay in sync, so a document started on a laptop can be signed from a phone without anything falling out of step. Desktop signing is covered through Print to Sign. For teams that sign on the move rather than at a desk, this is the part that gets used daily.

Pricing

Sign.Plus publishes its prices openly, with no sales call needed to see a number. One detail catches most buyers out: the figures on the pricing page are the annual rates. Pay month to month and every plan costs more, so both columns are below.

PlanMonthly billingAnnual billingSignature requestsHighlights
Free$0$03 total1 template, 1 user, no card required
Personal$14.99$9.9910/month1 user, 5 templates, Scan.Plus Pro included
Professional$29.99/user$19.99/userUnlimitedUp to 5 users, 10 templates, in-person signing
Business$49.99/user$29.99/userUnlimitedUnlimited templates, Zapier, custom branding
Enterprise$79.99/user$49.99/userUnlimitedSSO, HIPAA BAA, data residency, priority support

Annual billing saves up to 40% on Business, and every paid plan includes Scan.Plus Pro.

One cost the table does not show. Some advanced signing and verification features run on prepaid credits rather than the plan allowance: qualified signatures, SMS verification and ID checks. A QES is $5, so 100 qualified signatures a year adds $500 to the subscription.

Sign.Plus Developer API

The Developer API is a separate Sign.Plus product with its own plans and its own pricing page. You do not need it to use any of the eSignature plans above.

It is aimed at teams embedding signing into their own product or back office. It has a monthly and an annual column of its own, though the annual discount is far smaller here than on the eSignature side.

API planMonthlyAnnualSignature requests
Essential$79.99$75.99 ($911.99/yr)50/month
Grow$299.99$279.99 ($3,359.99/yr)200/month
Scale$719.99$659.99 ($7,919.99/yr)600/month
EnterpriseQuotedQuotedHigh volume

Paying yearly saves between 5% and 8% depending on the tier, so it is a much thinner discount than the 40% on the eSignature plans.

Check where the gates sit before picking a tier. Custom branding and SMS authentication start at Grow. HIPAA and webhooks are Enterprise only, so a webhook-driven integration puts you on the quoted plan whatever your volume.

Documentation, a sandbox and access tokens are available before you buy, so the API can be tested without a plan.

Security & Compliance

Sign.Plus is built under Swiss data protection law, and Alohi holds ISO/IEC 27001 and SOC 2 certifications. Both are independently audited rather than self-declared.

Documents are encrypted with AES-256 at rest, using a separate key per user instead of one shared key, and TLS 1.3 in transit. Two-factor authentication is available on every plan but is off by default, so switch it on before you send anything real.

Coverage is broad for the money: HIPAA with a signed BAA on Enterprise, plus GDPR, CCPA and PCI-DSS. HIPAA and PHIPA are request-based, so the compliance panel stays empty until you ask Alohi to put the agreement in place.

Data residency is the standout. You pick from 22 regions, Geneva and Zurich among them, with Switzerland as the default. That answers the Schrems II question directly, and few competitors at this price let you choose a country at all.

Every completed signature produces an audit trail and a separate certificate of completion: a signed PDF you file yourself. Your evidence does not depend on keeping a Sign.Plus account open.

Sign.Plus

Sign.Plus

Our Verdict
86 /100

Editorial score

Very Good

Last updated: 2026-05-13

Sign.Plus is the one to buy if you want legally solid signatures without enterprise overhead. The interface is the cleanest we have tested in this category, the Swiss and EU compliance is genuine, and published pricing on every tier means you can budget without a sales call.

Look elsewhere if you need deep CRM workflows or conditional approval chains. That is DocuSign and PandaDoc territory. US federal buyers are out as well, since there is no FedRAMP authorization.

For qualified signatures specifically, the closest alternative is Youtrust, a French ANSSI-supervised trust service provider. The legal outcome under eIDAS is the same, so the difference is commercial: Youtrust sells QES as a €10–15 per-signature add-on on its Plus or Pro tiers, Sign.Plus as $5 credits on top of a seat.

Teams that want single-vendor QTSP accountability lean Youtrust. Teams that want Swiss ZertES alongside eIDAS, with strong mobile apps, lean Sign.Plus.

Is the recommended tier worth paying for? Professional at $19.99 per user per month on annual billing is the one most small teams should buy.

It lifts the request cap, which is the limit you actually hit. Run the credit maths first if qualified signatures are part of the job.

FAQ

Sign.Plus Review β€” FAQ

How much does Sign.Plus cost?
Paid plans start at $9.99 a month for Personal on annual billing, rising to $19.99 per user for Professional, $29.99 for Business and $49.99 for Enterprise. Those are the annual rates, which is what Sign.Plus advertises; month to month the same plans are $14.99, $29.99, $49.99 and $79.99. There is also a free tier limited to three signature requests in total.
Is Sign.Plus really free?
There is a genuinely free plan, not a trial that expires. It covers three signature requests in total, one template and one user, with no card required. Three requests is a lifetime allowance rather than a monthly one, so it is enough to run a real transaction end to end and judge the product, but not to work from.
Does Sign.Plus support qualified electronic signatures (QES)?
Yes, under both the EU eIDAS regulation and Switzerland's ZertES law, issued through Swisscom Trust Services. QES is not included in any subscription, though. It is sold as a prepaid credit at $5 per signature and has to be bought separately, including on Enterprise. A hundred qualified signatures a year is $500 on top of your plan. One thing to plan for on the signer's side: choosing QES redirects your recipient to Swisscom to complete an identity check before they can sign.
Is Sign.Plus HIPAA compliant?
HIPAA with a signed BAA is available on the Enterprise plan, at $49.99 per user per month on annual billing. That is the cheapest published path to a BAA among the platforms we test. The agreement is request-based rather than self-serve, so the compliance panel in your account shows as non-compliant until you contact Alohi and put the BAA in place.
Where does Sign.Plus store my documents?
You choose from 22 regions across the Americas, Europe and Asia Pacific. Europe alone includes Geneva, Zurich, Frankfurt, London, Finland, Belgium and the Netherlands. Switzerland is the default, which matters if you need data to stay outside the United States. Very few platforms at this price let you pin storage to a named country.
Does Sign.Plus have an API?
Yes, as a separate product with its own plans. Essential is $79.99 a month for 50 signature requests, Grow $299.99 for 200 and Scale $719.99 for 600, with Enterprise quoted for high volume; paying yearly brings those to $75.99, $279.99 and $659.99 a month. The eSignature plans are unaffected, and you only need an API plan if you are embedding signing into your own product. Note that HIPAA and webhooks are Enterprise-only on the API side.
Can I sign in person on a shared device?
Yes, from the Professional plan upward. You hand a laptop or tablet to the person in front of you, they sign by hand on the screen, and the completed document and its certificate are filed automatically. It is the feature that suits clinics, letting agents and anyone signing across a counter rather than by email.
How does Sign.Plus compare with DocuSign?
Sign.Plus is cheaper and quicker to learn; DocuSign is deeper and better connected. Professional gives you unlimited signature requests at $19.99 per user, where DocuSign's comparable entry plan caps envelopes. DocuSign wins on integrations, on API access included in the plan, and on enterprise procurement. Sign.Plus wins on Swiss hosting, on price, and on getting a document out in under a minute.
Is Sign.Plus good for small teams?
It is one of the strongest options for them. Professional covers up to five users with unlimited requests, and the interface needs no training, which is where most small teams lose time. The limits to watch are seats being a paid add-on rather than a toggle, and both the API and QES sitting outside the subscription.
Alternatives to Consider

Alternatives to Consider

Not the right fit? Compare similar tools.

Best Overall
DocuSign

DocuSign

Editorial score

88 /100

The category-defining eSignature platform β€” unmatched compliance ceiling, 1,000+ integrations, and the brand recognition that keeps recipients clicking "Sign".

  • Web, mobile (iOS/Android), and desktop signing across 44+ signing languages
  • Templates with merge fields, conditional logic, and reusable layout libraries
  • Bulk Send: dispatch one template to thousands of recipients in a single action
Best For: Mid-market and enterprise teams in regulated industries β€” legal, finance, healthcare, life sciences, and federal agencies β€” that need the deepest compliance ceiling and broadest enterprise integration ecosystem in the eSignature category.
Editor's Pick
PandaDoc

PandaDoc

Editorial score

88 /100

All-in-one document creation, signing, payment, and analytics platform built for sales teams who write proposals and contracts as part of the deal.

  • Drag-drop block editor: text, images, tables, video, pricing tables, signature fields, payment blocks
  • 750+ pre-built templates for proposals, SOWs, NDAs, MSAs, sales contracts, and HR documents
  • Content library with reusable blocks managed by marketing, assembled by sales
Best For: Sales-led organizations, marketing agencies, and professional services firms that ship proposals, SOWs, and contracts as part of the revenue motion β€” and want document creation, signing, and payment in one workflow.
Best Ease of Use
Dropbox Sign

Dropbox Sign

Editorial score

86 /100

The polished mid-market eSignature platform β€” best-in-class UX, native Dropbox/Drive integration, and a developer-favorite API, formerly known as HelloSign.

  • Web, mobile (iOS/Android), and embedded signing across 22+ signer languages
  • Reusable templates with merge fields, signing roles, and saved signing orders
  • Native Dropbox, Google Drive, OneDrive, and Box integration: open a file, send for signature without download
Best For: SMBs and mid-market teams already using Dropbox or Google Drive, freelancers sending client agreements, and developers integrating signing into their own applications via API.
86

Sign.Plus

Very Good

Visit Website β†—